HomeКомпьютерные игрыRelated VideosMore From: 3kliksphilip

Reflex Test Results

10304 ratings | 312721 views
It's a topic that I've deliberately avoided because I hate drawing conclusions from stuff where I'm a variable. But I'm happy that the findings are conclusive enough, even if I don't understand why they're as big as they are in some cases. Long story short: Lowest input lag + highest refresh rate = best reflex time. But you'll still be slower than everybody else in CS:GO. Test your reaction time here: http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime Compare display lag results here: http://www.displaylag.com/ See my review of the 180 Hz Asus here, which shows how smooth movement is at higher refresh rates: https://youtu.be/k0CVI5-sOn8 0:00 - Theory and how I tested 1:00 - 60 VS higher Hz 2:05 - Response time / ghosting 2:38 - Overdrive tested 3:28 - Input lag 4:00 - 60 Hz VS 30 4:23 - TVs and 23 Hz lololol 5:09 - Conclusion I've only covered the monitor in this video, since it seems to be the major component that can contribute to delay. Check out my channels: ● 3kliksphilip: https://www.youtube.com/3kliksphilip ● 2kliksphilip: https://www.youtube.com/2kliksphilip ● kliksphilip: https://www.youtube.com/kliksphilip Other information you might like: ● Website: http://3kliksphilip.com ● Twitter: https://twitter.com/3kliksphilip ● PC Specs: Intel 3770K, 16 GB RAM, Geforce 670 2 GB.
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (1169)
Devil Inferno (2 days ago)
Lol I did a test with my own reflex. 60hz 183ms 187ms 298ms 219 ms 179ms 144hz 150ms 159ms 182ms 197 ms 221ms 240hz 128 ms 165 ms 148 ms 192 ms 145 ms
miss misanthropist (17 days ago)
on 75 hz my average is ~300 ms so my response times _are_ slow
Nixzidoo (1 month ago)
lol my reaction time is shit my best is 232 ms on a 60 hz monitor...... avg is about 260-270 (and even that's pushing it)
miss misanthropist (2 months ago)
the best i have is ~75 fps on my dell e1909w that is if the game i'm running doesn't tank my GT 710
lelcetz (3 months ago)
I'm retarded omega ree
dafff08 (3 months ago)
i was wondering why my results were so bad 200-250 even thought i would say i have pretty decent reflexes. well, this explains it. 60fps vsync on a low tier monitor
Daunt Nicholas (3 months ago)
That start killed me
Elia D (4 months ago)
so if i get 187 avreg on the test. on a lg flatron 60hz 10 yerold screen. +lag from the site.4g home internet wow
mAus (4 months ago)
Fastclickphilip
hunn20004 (5 months ago)
Screen year always infuriates me, always get more than 60 hz
Onceknown (5 months ago)
Should've done the tests 3 times so 15 for each refresh rate and find the average of the average. That's the scientific way
Shery Amna (5 months ago)
My reaction time is 198ms I tried on mob too its 350ms
reNINTENDO (5 months ago)
I've always found that website kind of weird. Like, I don't think there's anything wrong with the site or the test, but it is strange how much my reaction time can change from attempt to attempt. I probably fall around the 200ms mark, but sometimes I get more like 180 while seemingly doing nothing different. Other times I get more like 230. Granted those aren't actually large differences when you get down to it, but still. I guess you touched on it, but keep in mind the input device itself. I'm using a wireless mouse, which probably isn't helping my time any.
4G63_ (5 months ago)
I got 22 ms on a laptop's integrated 60hz screen because I predicted when it will turn green.
LESLEYYY (5 months ago)
This can be caused by a placebo, you should get someone to randomize the refresh rate and see then.
Rugg0064 (6 months ago)
You should have used CRU and changed it to even lower or Higher speeds
Timon Vnuk (6 months ago)
False as i got a 137 reaction time on 60 hz
Youpo1 (7 months ago)
I have a 140hz phone
Sean Jenkins (7 months ago)
You just roasted console gamers
Raymax Rogue (7 months ago)
That reflex test thing... i got 22ms
Menno Brandt (8 months ago)
WOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOOWW
Darwin O (8 months ago)
play going low in csgo with your tv
Michael Compton (9 months ago)
Hello, 3kliksphilip. Here are my results for two graphics modes on a cheap $90 LED monitor. (it's a really awful monitor). It should also be said that I fully expect I have a slower response time than your average human, so this cannot all be the fault of my computer or monitor. 1920x1080 @ 60hz 281ms 256ms 279ms 301ms 265ms Average = 276 1280x1024 @75hz 247ms 268ms 252ms 259ms 319ms Average = 269
David Gartner (1 year ago)
you love your job. it is so respectfull. I am appreciated u )) by the way I have been silver elite today ))
Jeffrey Cain (1 year ago)
I dont know what you're talking about, my 23 hertz monitor helps a lot, for instance I finally ranked up to silver 2
Trolof Meister (1 year ago)
i got lucky and got 27ms on my 11th try the screen didnt even turn green (lol)
Ploppy (1 year ago)
i have 60hz monitor and i got 125ms average
Ich Nicht (1 year ago)
Overdrive takes processing time. but for gaming its still worth it for the clearer image. just usually dont take the highest setting because of the ghosting
Jakarian Studios (1 year ago)
THE HUMAN EYE CANT SEE MORE THAN 6 FRAMES PER SECOND THOUGH.
DonTon (1 year ago)
And I am still here with my ghosty 59hz 1080p Monitor, that has terrible screen tearring.
Flam3Sm0k3 (1 year ago)
But the human eye can't see above 16FPS... /S
rzchzrd gznzzlzs (1 year ago)
if my girl😍😪 and 3kliksphilip👁💞were drowning🏊🏊 and I could only save one💣💥catch me at my girls funeral💀😢😭 eating🍴 3kliksphilips ass💦💦🍑🍳🍆
Kuu (9 months ago)
rzchzrd gznzzlzs I've never seen so much autism before.
wittkolin (1 year ago)
I usally have about 200ms reaction time but sometimes I just get 60 ms on thoose tests. How can you explain that?
Matthew Prather (1 year ago)
wittkolin You hit it early and get lucky
Unknown 258 (1 year ago)
1:41 lmao i see what u did there
ian (1 year ago)
2:44 OVERDRIVU
nils sahlsten (1 year ago)
I find myself performing alot worse in CS:GO these days than before. I theorized that it could be due to me using a 30hz TV as a screen and i used to use a 60hz screen. I also find myself having less fps recently going anywhere from 35 to 65 in MM. This video kinda confirmed for me that its most likely that reason im doing extra poorly in CS :o
Deaf (1 year ago)
lol I have one of those old VGA monitors with Max of 60Hertz and can be pushed to 75Hertz
Void Void (1 year ago)
3Klik, can you please give me the link to the music in this video when you're looking into the void
maxqia (1 year ago)
I wonder if subpixel shapes could affect this....
salepisblader12 (1 year ago)
I want to buy the Asus PG279Q it's a 2K IPS 165Hz 4ms monitor. I want to play and otger games like GTA V but mostly I play csgo, is it good for csgo? or a 1080p 144Hz monitor would be better (I want to try an IPS panel and 4ms is the best for IPS so I don't think that it will affect me)
Handsome Jack (1 year ago)
the lowest "reaction time" that i achieved was .091 i clicked randomly and i got it, "im fastur that my mouse bruh"
Chickerino Radio (1 year ago)
"23hz (cinematic)" i loled at that XD
zoiuduu (1 year ago)
he should put a entire sheet in the end, with all the results
zoiuduu (1 year ago)
my average was 269 ms,,,, i could never bet u guys in cs go
Stuttering Subaru (1 year ago)
my reaction time is now 1.52ms back when this video was first released I usually got 200ms at best
Benjamin Torres (1 year ago)
Im 13 i have 60hz and my reaction time is 298 :c
Benjamin Torres (1 year ago)
298ms
Crimson twelve (1 year ago)
Dang that reaction time though mine is about 230 and I thought that was good lol
A. N. (1 year ago)
How do you even get <200 lol my average is 202 after around 3 sets of 5, I'm using a 144hz with wired mouse and a pretty beefy GPU and CPU.
Ridheesh (1 year ago)
meanwhile I'm DMG with 30 FPS
NJOverclocked (1 year ago)
I have the PG278Q, fucking brilliant 165Hz monitor
I once got a lucky 14 ms reaction :)
Mr Mince (1 year ago)
Should of tested on a 500 hertz moniter. What a poor test you should feel ashamed of yourself. What would your mother say if she saw you talking about 60 or a 120 hertz. You would be called a console peasant and rightly so. You are a disgrace. Unsub. jk
Alex K. (1 year ago)
wot about caffeine?
Beary FUCKING Nice (1 year ago)
a human's average reaction time is 200 millisecond, in between 230 and 170
AlChimbo (1 year ago)
Use an old crt monitor instead, lol
Luke Foster (1 year ago)
My monitor only works at 60 hz, I paid $800 for it, wtf.
PaSta (2 months ago)
you got mugged haha... $800 is too expensive for 1440p 144hz IPS with gsync
Issac Coltman (1 year ago)
You can't make a scientific claim with one person.
BubbleCraftGaming (1 year ago)
What do you do if you have extremely bad reaction time (320 Ms average .-.)???
reNINTENDO (5 months ago)
It's probably input lag making the number so large. Not necessarily, but most likely. These online reaction time sites are cool, but they come with a lot more variables than physical tests. Also, it's sadly not really possible to improve your reaction time by any major amount, though caffeine might help a bit (I haven't been able to find any large studies on the subject however). All in all genetics are king here.
BubbleCraftGaming (1 year ago)
Parker Raines 😂 yeah, that helps... 😂
Parker Raines (1 year ago)
Be mad at your parents
Jorlok Zander (1 year ago)
Can anyone name me the "going low flashback" music? It's just so perfect...
Aggserp4 (1 year ago)
Jorlok Zander Psychobonk or something like that...
0x4452 (1 year ago)
You forgot to turn off the 3 pre-buffered frames from the graphics card control panel... Your claim that 120Hz gives you 22 ms advantage when the frame takes just 8 ms faster is likely false. This comes from 3 pre-buffered frames x 8 ms faster each = 24 ms. So you are quite consistent at measuring 22 ms. NVIDIA lets you override this to improve latency at the expense of minor FPS hit. Not sure if AMD allows changing it.
emre1393 (1 year ago)
if you have bad internet connection (>100ms latency), refresh rate doesnt matter
Kristupas Pocevicius (1 year ago)
I physically want to turn into a pickle
Is my 2.8 inch good? (1 year ago)
Fuken fuk fuk trying to describe your real reaction time is hard --> First you need to see the thing and then your brain need to tell your hand/fingers to click AND your mouse need to tell the computer to click the button or whatever (3:28 he says this part that i cant really describe) and all of this takes a super small amout of time but it is still something so your real reaction time is when you see the Green or what ever you see pop up :) Sorry i am bad at describing things and my english is not that good either cause im from Sweden.. wops There is some more things that happen ofc but im to lazy and my comment whould be too long AND i am not that smart c;
ItzNohnDoe (1 year ago)
I used cheap headphones and it doesn't sound like I thought it would in game the sounds sound farther and harder to hear players footsteps
spooK_xd (1 year ago)
If anybody needs to know how to turn off ghosting on the ASUS PB287q, (what I have) you have to turn "Trace Free" to 0, and that helped.
craggy rocks (1 year ago)
1:39 LOL xD my response time is so inconstant swinging between 200ms and 350ms I really hate to be focused and alert when I play CSGO I hate to aim and wait for the enemy to come out, It drives me nuts to be alert for 10 or 20 seconds ! I like to hide behind something and peek every two or three seconds
Xavier H. (1 year ago)
my reaction time is worse than a blind person's. at least 250 every time, average of 300, hopefully its just my monitor ':{
IGNORERAD (1 year ago)
u r awesome
Tiedyetophat (1 year ago)
*Owns 144 and 60 hz monitors* *Takes three runs of each* *Gets 5 ms faster on the 60hz* WTF?
Cally (1 year ago)
Your 60hz monitor may have a better input lag/response time compared to your 144 hz monitor.
nogoodusername25 (1 year ago)
Too small sample size?
Cat Mlem (1 year ago)
oh, i guess that is why everyone yells at me when i have 15 ping and do poorly on my one pc even though its faster....
Bubble Double (1 year ago)
Wow, my average was 255 ms in a 60 hz monitor, but then at my 8th attempt, i did an 44ms reaction time, i swear, like how. I can't even believe it myself
Arkamis (1 year ago)
0:40 hello dad 😂
jaymo1011 (1 year ago)
"only good enough for console gamers" shots fired
Kappa ccino (1 year ago)
My results. 60hz: 277ms 100hz: 253ms 120hz: 250ms 144hz: 246ms 185hz: 236ms I did all of these after warming up with CS:GO DM/1v1 and some other reaction tests.
Tee Phutson (1 year ago)
0:11 you dont have monitor driver install? Mine shown monitor model. Once my was Generic PnP Monitor too. Hi (English sorry for my bad)
Jack The Lad (1 year ago)
so should i keep 60 hertz or make it higher ?
Jack The Lad (1 year ago)
so should i keep 60 hertz or make it higher ?
InstantZock (1 year ago)
0:35 we just ignore the swag guy in the background thats skating like a boss
Marko (1 year ago)
Hello Philip, I would like to know if new gaming IPS 144hz monitors are as good as TN panel monitors. If anyone can direct me to some benchmarks and tests I would appreciate it a lot. Thanks.
X MAN (1 year ago)
where do you learn about math?
Sonu Dae (1 year ago)
I have 60hz and I do the test and I got 74ms/avg :/
Fraug L. Coolman (1 year ago)
isnt another variable the mouse you have
jose (1 year ago)
great channel
Human eye cannot see beyond 2 monitors
If I have 1000Hz, will I have <100ms response time?
Mattnel (1 year ago)
your 30 hz 4k test was litteraly better then my average
Mattnel (1 year ago)
i get 270-300 ms with 60 hz im thinking im terrible at csgo because of it or maybe the care adrenaline and maybe other chemicals help me to do maybe 250 ms in game who even knows
PaSta (2 months ago)
cs is all about how fast you think ... not how fast you react :P
GenocidalEdge (1 year ago)
Not gonna lie, I've had my 144 monitor for like 6 months, just now figured out it was stuck on 60 this whole time....
Circle Clicker (1 year ago)
"Only good enough for console gamers" Oh shit they will get mad and type up some responses on their crappy computers #Pcmasterrace
Parker Raines (1 year ago)
No, they'll take five minutes to type from a controller "u suk filip" from the YouTube app that they need to pay 60/year to use on their XBox
Oscar Brogden (1 year ago)
Do a blind test.
The Crops (1 year ago)
lg 24gm77-b best low bugdet 144hz deskop.
Artem Korolev (1 year ago)
Great video, I've been really interested in this topic for a while. What about the old-school CRT monitors? Could you try testing those?
DangerouS KinG (1 year ago)
AHAHAHAHAHAH the 23hz part was hilarious. xD nice vid man
Oliver Kern (1 year ago)
0:57 wow :O
CM16 Vidz (1 year ago)
plymouth hoe !
EpIcN3Ss24 (1 year ago)
why spend $200 on a monitor what could but more likely not help you, where you can spend $20 on some hacks what makes you a god?
Frank Nowak (1 year ago)
jesus, my shit is slow, 280ms+ every time. rip
Michael G. (1 year ago)
wait didnt his reaction time _averages_ vary by 32 ms? thats not good for results really thats more than the difference between the highest hz reaction times average in the first test and the 60 hz reaction times average in the comparison to 30 hz, and even nearly the difference between the 180 and 60 hz results in the first test alone o.O
JohnFrosty (1 year ago)
BRING BACK ECID!!!!

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.