Install Alliance NOW and get 50,000 gold and 50 gems!
iOS - http://bit.ly/2oU2pja
Android - http://bit.ly/2p1XgVg
Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/valvenewsnetwork
Watch my Streams : http://www.twitch.tv/valvenewsnetwork
Steam Group : http://steamcommunity.com/groups/VNN
Today on Valve News Network, we take a look at the entire history of Valve apparent upcoming game engine, Source 2. We cover every official mention, announcement, and most important, leaks.
My Social Media :
Twitter : https://twitter.com/ValveNewsNetwor
Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/valvenewsnetwork/
Waffler Weekly : goo.gl/Fm28Ge
Is L4D2 Authoring tools/ SDK (source1) worth using for a game project or should I jump on the UE4 wagon? Yes, I'll be importing my own 3D characters and prop models. You see, I like how straight forward Source seems testing a playable map/mod without much programming. However, I know UE4 has no limitations, but requires small knowledge of programming even w/ blue prints. Also, L4D2 has the sketchup plug-in. I'm well versed in Maya, blender, zbrush, and PS.
I think Motion Blur is already there in Source but I may be wrong... Well, with older titles on Source 2, I'd say good luck. Valve has seemingly forgotten about them. They probably will be porting their most popular titles like CSGO and TF2 and also port things like Half-Life 2, Left 4 Dead 2 and Portal 2. But with HL2DM, Counter-Strike Source and Day of Defeat Source there is little possibility. Valve has pretty much forgotten about them and specificly with CS Source's case, if Valve's going to port CSGO, there's no need to port another Counter-Strike game. Also, since these games are really old, even if they are ported, there's a chance they will end up like Half-Life Source, in which it was also ported from GoldSrc to Source and it was broken.
Well, that would be Half-Life 3 Deathmatch... Or if they do port over the older games to Source 2, that would cause problems with the naming. Counter-Strike Source would be CS Source 2, Day of Defeat Source would be DoD Source 2 and so on... People would think that these are sequels to the original games because of the "2" at the end but really, it's just a port...
Technically, they can count up to 3. They just don't how to spell 3. I mean, they released a 3rd Counter-Strike game so they do know how to count. They just don't know how to spell it when it comes to things like Left 4 Dead 3!
If you are counting the first games released on the said engine it should go like
GoldSrc=HL1, Source=CSS, Source 2=Dota 2
But if you are counting Half-Life games...
GoldSrc=HL1, Source=HL2, Source 2=???
We are at least getting games, you know. There's In The Valley Of The God's also coming out on Source 2. Don't act like Valve is doing ALL WRONG and is not being serious in making games, just because you got one card game on a seemingly superior engine.
I think Valve focuses too much on not being seen to conform to rumours and I would bet money on them being held back by leaks from the past.
Furthermore they need to fix or reinvent there VAC system, Now clearly they are able to just hardware/i.p ban these people, But in the effort to remove the cheaters need to 'beat the system' they are taking the 'let them cheat but put them against cheaters approach' this is very clever as it will put the players that try to hide in with the players that are raging thus making the game no longer enjoyable to play for them.
The reason I started with this is that the potentially MASSIVE games like CS need to be clean and competitive to be a success and if i had a new engine (baring in mind my previous engine was destroyed by cheaters) it would have to be 'cheater proof' before i release my new IP and I believe that a select few at valve are acutely aware of just how bad the cheating problem is but are keeping it watered down for everyone else and the public as its totally believable that it can't be "that" bad and in fact there are a lot of cheaters that don't realise there playing against cheaters and spend a lot of the game trying to hide it, Its an incredibly interesting situation.
Now "knowing this" my only concern would be do they really know just how few players are COMPLETELY clean, Even players that i can see have well trained aim, movement and mental dexterity still whip out anti aim now and again.
I guess the answer to that would be that they will be able to detect ANY cheat and these players would most likely start with no cheats to test the new cheat system anywho.
Anyway I'm gonna keep flying the flag of ONLY SKILL and lets see if Valve rewards me cos they f**king better :-D
Wow okay so people where talking about neglecting tech and focused instead on games but its opposite now and we know why but know we know how long they've been thinking about focusing on tech instead of games
I've worked in the Source engine for 5 years, making The Battle Grounds 3. I've done everything including mapping, modelling, audio, and ground-up AI programming. I've thrown at it everything and the kitchen sink. Very powerful engine. Hard to get into, because there's almost no documentation available.
Let me tell you what Source does better than Unreal or Unity. It has better geometry building tools. I'm talking about the classic Quake-era blocks. In Unreal, if you want the textures on geometry to align, you have to manually enter the coordinates. In Source, you can do it in one click. And Unity? Unity does not even have the quake-era simple geometry, which means that for *every* rectangular prism you want, you have to redo the textures in an external modelling program. Talk about a downgrade.
I just hope Source 2 provides all the modern stuff with better performance, VR, and all, yet keeps the great geometry building tools of old.
Also i bet the reason they haven't made a HL3 yet is because there hasn't been much change in terms of physics, HL2 was awesome back then with Havok, and is still really good today. They need real time land/terrain interaction, realistic fire & water.. not scripted, that's the way forward. And auto AI learning, though admittedly that last one is probably a bit too early yet.
Source 3 comfirmed!
after watching the video and reading the comments below, i can say something simple regarding the hate against source 2 and that source2 would have a hard time competing against unity and cryengien.. simple.
It's not about how big you have, it's about how you use it.
-Alien Observer 2018
Hooray, I'm ValveTime!
Seriously though, Source 2 is a weird case of experimenting in different areas until you're spread thin and end up resting on your laurels again with Artifact.
I've entertained the idea of reimplementing the "feel" and compatibility of Source on a newer open-source engine like Godot, but ultimately the enthusiasm from the developer side is waning enough that the indie community won't even entertain its existence.
Time may prove wrong, but for now we're pretty exhausted.
at 1:15 i played that mission and when you get to the magnet thing you have to pick up stuff and put down the bridge, and later on i found a road and another bridge but i don't know if i should go there by walk because my buggy cant climb ladders, or is there another way to get the buggy up there plshelp
I'm just here dreaming of Half-Life 3 in Source 2, day night sequences, cloth physics to animate NPC clothing and hair, higher poly count models for DOG and Alyx, destructive physics brush environments with bits that break off upon weapon impact, procedural physics sequences like glass shards falling off a window in real-time, contorting physics properties and transforming or weaponizing elements via Gravity Gun enhancement. Don't mind me.
the fuck does my age have to do with him being a sellout? as mentioned before being Sponsored doesnt make you a sellout.Anyone who sacrifices artistic integrity in an effort to become more successful or popular is a sellout Tyler doesnt sacrifice his content to become more "popular" or "sucessful" he just simply needs the money to make more content.That's litteraly just it
>8:25 "We would like to have everyone working on games here at Valve to eventually be using the same engine. "
"Working on" may be different than "Maintaining", but really hoping this may mean TF2 would move to Source 2 someday. That of TF3.
Can you please learn how to correctly use apostrophes? As in: "Valve's," "firm's," "everyone's," "that's," "there's," "you're," "we've," etc. This video is embarrassing to watch because you appear uneducated.
To everyone who is complaining about Valve taking so long to release Source 2:
THEY DON'T OWE YOU ANYTHING, THE ONLY REASON THEY RELEASE THE ENGINE IS FOR USER GENERATED CONTENT, AND AS LONG AS THERE AREN'T ANY GAMES ON IT EXCEPT FOR DOTA 2 (Which it has an editor for UGC that runs on Source 2) THEY WON'T RELEASE IT TO THE PUBLIC.
maybe valve is just lazier these days after all them steam profits. nah but realistically I'm sure they have their goals they want to meet, and they time take and effort to meet halfway. Maybe at some point Gabe and others realized things we don't know publicly.
That final section sums up modern Valve in a nutshell. Nobody has any god damn idea what they're doing because there's absolutely no direction. I bet Source 2 is nowhere near finished because the four people sitting in a closet somewhere working on it in their spare time left and the others are too busy experimenting.
Microsoft wants to advertise the game even further. There are some ways it is possible to find out whats happening with the server so that you can better plan your free time at the same time you wait to play. Service was great, because its at Republic. So you dont need to produce the service always perform request to a different service. In case you should construct the service properly so that people actually preferred to utilize it, you would boost demand. Users experiences are like receiving an SMS, but with improved functionality and at a portion of the price tag. Should you do an excellent job on all the measures you will have a prosperous quiz evening.
What Everybody Dislikes About Pubg Twitter and Why
The feedback is provided in a personal and interactive way. It is not given mostly because people dont ask for it-theyre just not aware that they can ask for it, and many people lack the skills to get the information they need. If people seek their own feedback at one time that is quite beneficial for them, theyll be more open to receiving the feedback. Also, the majority of people prefer to get negative feedback privately. Contrary to popular misperceptions, they want on-the-job feedback--they want to know how they are doing, what is going well, and what things do they need to work on. No need to consider about acknowledgments, just make certain you can take care of the messages fast enough and return a 204. Be sure to keep and eye on the logs to see whether your messages come through.
Okay, unless youve been buried beneath a rock for a gamer, you already understand what TitanFall is about. Assembly The new fans are intended to increase airflow above their predecessors while also keeping up a pleasant sound profile. Many consider it one of the very best anime series in the past few years. Game titles like FIFA, Madden, and NBA 2K are quite popular in the sports gaming marketplace. When it regards the Fortnite vs. PUBG gameplay battle, building is easily the most important divergence between both. There is additionally a multiplayer arena to check your skills against other players online. Lastly you must engage your audience.
You are going to have wonderful experience with either and should not have any trouble finding lots of rivals to mercilessly murder. Just make certain you still live a balance life when enjoying your very best game yet! Theres plenty to do for the entire family. Adding friends in PUBG Mobile is a fairly streamlined and straightforward practice. As soon as your friend accepts the request, youre going to be prepared to play together! You dont need to be Steam friends to be PUBG buddies. When you own a couple of weapons and other things, you can begin making decisions on which weapons that you want to keep and manage your inventory a bit more.